Reconciliation Reaffirmed: A Reply to Steverson

Environmental Values 5 (4):363 - 368 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In this reply to Brian Steverson's objections to my reconciliationist argument, I have clarified the requirements that follow from my principles of environmental justice. I have also clarified the notion of intrinsic value that I am endorsing and the grounds on which my claim of greater intrinsic value for humans rests



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,442

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On Norton’s Reply to Steverson.Brian K. Steverson - 1997 - Environmental Ethics 19 (3):335-336.
Reconciliation reaffirmed: A reply to Peffer.James P. Sterba - 1992 - Journal of Social Philosophy 23 (1):145-149.
In Defence of Anthropomorphic Theism.Peter Forrest - 2011 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 3 (1):105 - 122.
Ecocentrism and ecological modeling.Brian K. Steverson - 1994 - Environmental Ethics 16 (1):71-88.
Reply to Gale and Pruss.John F. Post - 2004 - Philo 7 (1):114-121.


Added to PP

15 (#701,025)

6 months
2 (#301,800)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James P. Sterba
University of Notre Dame

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references