Pantheism and current ontology

Religious Studies 40 (1):63-80 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Pantheism claims: (1) there exists an all-inclusive unity; and (2) that unity is divine. I review three current and scientifically viable ontologies to see how pantheism can be developed in each. They are: (1) materialism; (2) Platonism; and (3) class-theoretic Pythagoreanism. I show how each ontology has an all-inclusive unity. I check the degree to which that unity is: eternal, infinite, complex, necessary, plentiful, self-representative, holy. I show how each ontology solves the problem of evil (its theodicy) and provides for salvation (its soteriology). I conclude that Platonism and Pythagoreanism have the most divine all-inclusive unities. They support sophisticated contemporary pantheisms. (Published Online February 17 2004).

Similar books and articles

Polytheism, pantheism, and the ontological argument.R. Harwood - 1999 - Religious Studies 35 (4):477-491.
Pantheism, substance and unity.Michael P. Levine - 1992 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 32 (1):1 - 23.
American Naturalism on Pantheism 1.Martin O. Yalcin - 2011 - American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 32 (2):156 - 179.
After life.Eugene Thacker - 2010 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
524 (#33,636)

6 months
142 (#22,183)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Eric Steinhart
William Paterson University of New Jersey

Citations of this work

The Coherence of Naturalistic Personal Pantheism.Asha Lancaster-Thomas - 2020 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 12 (1):75.

Add more citations

References found in this work

On the Plurality of Worlds.David K. Lewis - 1986 - Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell.
Ontological relativity and other essays.Willard Van Orman Quine (ed.) - 1969 - New York: Columbia University Press.
On the Plurality of Worlds.David Lewis - 1986 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 178 (3):388-390.
What numbers could not be.Paul Benacerraf - 1965 - Philosophical Review 74 (1):47-73.
On the Plurality of Worlds.Allen Stairs - 1988 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 49 (2):333-352.

View all 52 references / Add more references