Fabio Sterpetti
Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza
This chapter tries to answer the following question: How should we conceive of the method of mathematics, if we take a naturalist stance? The problem arises since mathematical knowledge is regarded as the paradigm of certain knowledge, because mathematics is based on the axiomatic method. Moreover, natural science is deeply mathematized, and science is crucial for any naturalist perspective. But mathematics seems to provide a counterexample both to methodological and ontological naturalism. To face this problem, some authors tried to naturalize mathematics by relying on evolutionism. But several difficulties arise when we try to do this. This chapter suggests that, in order to naturalize mathematics, it is better to take the method of mathematics to be the analytic method, rather than the axiomatic method, and thus conceive of mathematical knowledge as plausible knowledge.
Keywords Mathematical Knowledge  Naturalism  Analytic Method  Axiomatic Method
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Realism, Mathematics and Modality.Hartry Field - 1988 - Philosophical Topics 16 (1):57-107.
Knowledge and Its Limits.Timothy Williamson - 2005 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (2):452-458.
Knowledge and its Limits.Timothy Williamson - 2000 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 64 (1):200-201.
Knowledge and Its Limits.Timothy Williamson - 2003 - Philosophical Quarterly 53 (210):105-116.
Mathematical Truth.Paul Benacerraf - 1973 - Journal of Philosophy 70 (19):661-679.

View all 79 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Mathematical Knowledge and Naturalism.Fabio Sterpetti - 2019 - Philosophia 47 (1):225-247.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Mathematical Knowledge and Naturalism.Fabio Sterpetti - 2019 - Philosophia 47 (1):225-247.
Mathematical Discourse Vs. Mathematical Intuition.Carlo Cellucci - 2005 - In Carlo Cellucci & Donald Gillies (eds.), Mathematical Reasoning and Heuristics. College Publications. pp. 137-165..
Is Mathematics Problem Solving or Theorem Proving?Carlo Cellucci - 2017 - Foundations of Science 22 (1):183-199.
The Nature of Mathematical Explanation.Carlo Cellucci - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 39 (2):202-210.
What's There to Know? A Fictionalist Approach to Mathematical Knowledge.Mary Leng - 2007 - In Mary Leng, Alexander Paseau & Michael Potter (eds.), Mathematical Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hilbert, Completeness and Geometry.Giorgio Venturi - 2011 - Rivista Italiana di Filosofia Analitica Junior 2 (2):80-102.
From Mathematics to Philosophy.Hao Wang - 1974 - London and Boston: Routledge.
Descartes’s Mathematical Thought.C. Sasaki - 2003 - Springer Science & Business Media.


Added to PP index

Total views
344 ( #29,500 of 2,499,615 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
45 ( #18,833 of 2,499,615 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes