Critique (2017)

Authors
Andrew Stephenson
University of Southampton
Abstract
In this extended critical discussion of 'Kant's Modal Metaphysics' by Nicholas Stang (OUP 2016), I focus on one central issue from the first chapter of the book: Stang’s account of Kant’s doctrine that existence is not a real predicate. In §2 I outline some background. In §§3-4 I present and then elaborate on Stang’s interpretation of Kant’s view that existence is not a real predicate. For Stang, the question of whether existence is a real predicate amounts to the question: ‘could there be non-actual possibilia?’ (p.35). Kant’s view, according to Stang, is that there could not, and that the very notion of non-actual or ‘mere’ possibilia is incoherent. In §5 I take a close look at Stang’s master argument that Kant’s Leibnizian predecessors are committed to the claim that existence is a real predicate, and thus to mere possibilia. I argue that it involves substantial logical commitments that the Leibnizian could reject. I also suggest that it is danger of proving too much. In §6 I explore two closely related logical commitments that Stang’s reading implicitly imposes on Kant, namely a negative universal free logic and a quantified modal logic that invalidates the Converse Barcan Formula. I suggest that each can seem to involve Kant himself in commitment to mere possibilia.
Keywords Kant  Modality  Metaphysics  Logic  Possibilism  Actualism  Leibniz  Ontology  Real Predicate  Existence
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Semantical Considerations on Modal Logic.Saul A. Kripke - 1963 - Acta Philosophica Fennica 16:83-94.
Logic, Metalogic and Neutrality.Timothy Williamson - 2013 - Erkenntnis 79 (Suppl 2):211-231.
On Existentialism.Alvin Plantinga - 1983 - Philosophical Studies 44 (1):1 - 20.
Bare Possibilia.Timothy Williamson - 1998 - Erkenntnis 48 (2-3):257--73.

View all 19 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Formalizing Kant’s Rules.Richard Evans, Andrew Stephenson & Marek Sergot - 2019 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 48:1-68.
Nicholas Stang, Kant's Modal Metaphysics. [REVIEW]Colin McLear - 2018 - Philosophical Review 127 (4):523-528.
Heidegger's Confessions.Judith Wolfe - 2018 - Philosophical Review 127 (4):528-531.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Kant's Modal Metaphysics by Nicholas F. Stang.Uygar Abaci - 2017 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 55 (1):169-170.
Kant and Frege on Existence.Toni Kannisto - 2018 - Synthese (8):01-26.
Leibniz and Kant on Possibility and Existence.Ohad Nachtomy - 2012 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (5):953-972.
Was Existence Ever a Predicate?Edgar Morscher - 1985 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 25 (1):269-284.
Was Existence Ever a Predicate?Edgar Morscher - 1985 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 25 (1):269-284.
Modal Logic: An Introduction to its Syntax and Semantics.Nino B. Cocchiarella & Max A. Freund - 2008 - Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press USA.
Kant's Argument That Existence is Not a Determination.Nicholas F. Stang - 2015 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 91 (1):583-626.
Reply to Fine.Timothy Williamson - 2016 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 46 (4-5):571-583.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-02-28

Total views
259 ( #42,886 of 2,519,650 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
37 ( #23,399 of 2,519,650 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes