Kierkegaard on Theistic Proof

Religious Studies 26 (2):219 - 226 (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It has been customary among analytic philosophers not to think highly of, and even to denigrate Kierkegaard. Their view is exemplified by the late Henry Aiken who writes that that Kierkegaard ‘usually does not argue for his position: he merely presents it’. Or that, as according to Aiken, one ‘distinguished Oxford philosopher’ is reported to have remarked, ‘Kierkegaard is not one of those philosophers on whom you can sharpen your wits’. It seems to me on the contrary, that Kierkegaard does indeed present arguments for his views. What follows is an example of this

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Modal theistic arguments.Graham Oppy - 1993 - Sophia 32 (2):17-24.
God, Reason and Theistic Proof.Stephen T. Davis - 1997 - Edinburgh University Press.
Demea's a priori Theistic Proof.Kenneth Williford - 2003 - Hume Studies 29 (1):99-123.
Theistic orthodoxy, theistic consubstantialism, and theistic internalism.Robert Oakes - 1986 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 19 (3):177 - 189.
Kant, Modality, and the Most Real Being.Andrew Chignell - 2009 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 91 (2):157-192.
Spirituality, Expertise, and Philosophers.Bryan Frances - 2013 - In L. Kvanvig Jonathan (ed.), Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion. Oxford University Press. pp. 44-81.
.[author unknown] - unknown
The rationality of belief in God.George I. Mavrodes - 1970 - Englewood Cliffs, N.J.,: Prentice-Hall.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
18 (#711,533)

6 months
1 (#1,040,386)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references