If Friendship Hurts, an Epicurean Deserts: A Reply to Andrew Mitchell

Essays in Philosophy 3 (1):70-72 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Mitchell defends the Epicurean account of friendship. I argue that since Epicureans are hedonists who hold that all pleasures are good and all pains are bad, Epicureans would desert their friends in circumstances in which standing by their friends causes them pain.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Epicurean Virtues, Epicurean Friendship: Cicero vs. the Herculaneum Papyri.David Armstrong - 2011 - In Jeffrey Fish & Kirk R. Sanders (eds.), Epicurus and the Epicurean tradition. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 105-128.
Is Epicurean Friendship Altruistic?Tim O'Keefe - 2001 - Apeiron 34 (4):269 - 305.
Friendship Amongst the Self-Sufficient: Epicurus.Andrew Mitchell - 2001 - Essays in Philosophy 2 (2):99-107.
The Invulnerable Pleasures of Epicurean Friendship.David O'Connor - 1989 - Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 30:165–86.
Just deserts? Reply.Daniel Brudney - 2007 - Hastings Center Report 37 (3):6-6.
Friendship With God?Wanda Cizewski - 1992 - Philosophy and Theology 6 (4):369-381.
War and Friendship'.Basil Mitchell - 1993 - In Kelly James Clark (ed.), Philosophers Who Believe. Intervarsity Press. pp. 25.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-15

Downloads
12 (#1,015,715)

6 months
5 (#510,007)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

William O. Stephens
Creighton University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references