Ethics of open access to biomedical research: Just a special case of ethics of open access to research

Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 2:31 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The ethical case for Open Access (OA) (free online access) to research findings is especially salient when it is public health that is being compromised by needless access restrictions. But the ethical imperative for OA is far more general: It applies to all scientific and scholarly research findings published in peer-reviewed journals. And peer-to-peer access is far more important than direct public access. Most research is funded so as to be conducted and published, by researchers, in order to be taken up, used, and built upon in further research and applications, again by researchers (pure and applied, including practitioners), for the benefit of the public that funded it – not in order to generate revenue for the peer-reviewed journal publishing industry (nor even because there is a burning public desire to read much of it). Hence OA needs to be mandated, by researchers' institutions and funders, for all research

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The ethics of open access publishing.Michael Parker - 2013 - BMC Medical Ethics 14 (1):16.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
43 (#324,761)

6 months
7 (#175,814)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?