Comments on Wilson’s “Is Epistemic Permissivism a Consistent Position to Argue from?”

Southwest Philosophy Review 33 (2):23-26 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is Epistemic Permissivism a Consistent Position to Argue from?Matthew Wilson - 2017 - Southwest Philosophy Review 33 (1):43-51.
Total Pragmatic Encroachment and Epistemic Permissiveness.Katherine Rubin - 2015 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 96 (1):12-38.
The illusion of discretion.Kurt Sylvan - 2016 - Synthese 193 (6):1635-1665.
Dynamic permissivism.Abelard Podgorski - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (7):1923-1939.
The trouble with having standards.Han Li - 2019 - Philosophical Studies 176 (5):1225-1245.
Permissivism and the Value of Rationality: A Challenge to the Uniqueness Thesis.Miriam Schoenfield - 2018 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 99 (2):286-297.
Leaps of Knowledge.Andrew Reisner - 2013 - In Timothy Chan (ed.), The Aim of Belief. Oxford University Press. pp. 167-183.
Epistemic Value and the Jamesian Goals.Sophie Horowitz - 2018 - In Kristoffer Ahlstrom-Vij & Jeff Dunn (eds.), Epistemic Consequentialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-04-19

Downloads
26 (#574,431)

6 months
6 (#417,196)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Todd Stewart
Illinois State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references