Competing interests: The need to control conflict of interests in biomedical research

Science and Engineering Ethics 2 (4):457-468 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Individual and institutional conflict of interests in biomedical research have becomes matters of increasing concern in recent years. In the United States, the growth in relationships — sponsored research agreements, consultancies, memberships on boards, licensing agreements, and equity ownership — between for-profit corporations and research universities and their scientists has made the problem of conflicts, particularly financial conflicts, more acute. Conflicts can interfere with or compromise important principles and obligations of researchers and their institutions, e.g., adherence to accepted research norms, duty of care to patients, and open exchange of information. Disclosure is a key component of a successful conflict policy. Commitments which conflict with a faculty member's primary obligations to teaching, research, administrative responsibilities, or patient care also need attention. Institutional conflict of interests present different problems, some of which are discussed in an analysis of an actual problem posed by two proposed clinical trials.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
37 (#419,437)

6 months
3 (#1,023,809)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The impact of conflict of interest on trust in science.Paul J. Friedman - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (3):413-420.
Assessing conflict of interest: Sources of bias.Stephanic J. Bird - 1996 - Science and Engineering Ethics 2 (4):386-388.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references