History of Philosophy Quarterly 27 (2):145-164 (2010)

Authors
Justin Steinberg
Brooklyn College (CUNY)
Abstract
In this paper, I maintain—contrary to those commentators who regard him as a principled republican—that at the core of Spinoza’s political theory is an instrumental, rather than an intrinsic, defense of democratic procedures. Specifically, Spinoza embraces democratic decision procedures primarily because they tend to result in better decisions, defined relative to a procedure-independent standard of correctness or goodness. In contemporary terms, Spinoza embraces an epistemic defense of democracy. I examine Spinoza’s defense of collective governance, showing not only how it differs from other accounts of his time but also how it might contribute to current debates about the epistemic standing of popular governing bodies. In the opening section I defend the thesis that has been contested in recent years that Spinoza was, in fact, a consistent democrat. The second section focuses on procedural (i.e., intrinsic) defenses of democracy, paying particular attention to the republican version of proceduralism that was prominent in Spinoza’s time. And in the final section I present my case for reading Spinoza as an epistemic democrat, comparing his epistemic defense with contemporary versions. What we find are not only striking anticipations of contemporary arguments, but also largely neglected lines of argumentation that reveal both the potential epistemic advantages and disadvantages of democracy.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Law of Group Polarization.Cass R. Sunstein - 2002 - Journal of Political Philosophy 10 (2):175–195.
From Democracy to Aristocracy: Spinoza, Reason and Politics.Raia Prokhovnik - 1997 - History of European Ideas 23 (2-4):105-115.
Tolerance as a Virtue in Spinoza's.Michael A. Rosenthal - 2001 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 39 (4).

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Politics as a Model of Pedagogy in Spinoza.Justin Steinberg - 2020 - Ethics and Education 15 (2):158-172.
Spinoza, Before and After the Rampjaar.Bartholomew Begley - 2022 - The European Legacy 27 (6):563-582.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Re-Reading Irigaray's Spinoza.Sarah Donovan - 2009 - In Moira Gatens (ed.), Feminist Interpretations of Benedict Spinoza. Pennsylvania State University Press.
Reason, Sexuality, and the Self in Spinoza.David West - 2009 - In Moira Gatens (ed.), Feminist Interpretations of Benedict Spinoza. Pennsylvania State University Press.
Law and Sovereignty in Spinoza's Politics.Susan James - 2009 - In Moira Gatens (ed.), Feminist Interpretations of Benedict Spinoza. Pennsylvania State University Press. pp. 211--28.
Philosophy of Benedict De Spinoza.Benedictus de Spinoza - 1933 - New York: Tudor Publishing Co..
Feminist Interpretations of Benedict Spinoza.Moira Gatens (ed.) - 2009 - Pennsylvania State University Press.
Benedict De Spinoza.H. F. Hallett - 1957 - Fair Lawn, N.J., Essential Books].
Benedict de Spinoza.I. L. - 1958 - Review of Metaphysics 11 (4):692-692.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-03-10

Total views
155 ( #76,674 of 2,519,650 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #66,504 of 2,519,650 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes