Thomas Hobbes and the Debate Over Natural Law and Religion

New York: Routledge (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The argument laid out in this book discusses and interprets the work of Hobbes in relation to religion. It compares a traditional interpretation of Hobbes where Hobbes’ use of conventional terminology when talking about natural law is seen as ironic or merely convenient despite an atheist viewpoint, with the view that Hobbes’ morality is truly traditional and Christian. The book considers other thinkers of the age in tandem with Hobbes and discusses in detail his theology inspired by corporeal mechanics. The position is that there are significant senses in which Hobbes can be said to be a traditional natural law theorist

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On Thomas Hobbes's Fallible Natural Law Theory.Michael Cuffaro - 2011 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 28 (2):175-190.
Hobbes 'forgotten Natural Histories'.Robin Bunce - 2006 - Hobbes Studies 19 (1):77-104.
Divine law and human law in Hobbes's Leviathan.Greg Forster - 2003 - History of Political Thought 24 (2):189-217.
Thomas Hobbes and the natural law tradition.Norberto Bobbio - 1993 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hobbes without Grotius.P. Zagorin - 2000 - History of Political Thought 21 (1):16-40.
Natural Right in Hobbes and Kant.Howard Williams - 2012 - Hobbes Studies 25 (1):66-90.
Hobbes's Theory of Rights.Eleanor Ann Curran - 1998 - Dissertation, City University of New York
Kant against Hobbes: Reasoning and rhetoric.Gabriella Slomp - 2007 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 4 (2):207-222.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-10-21

Downloads
6 (#1,425,536)

6 months
6 (#522,885)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references