Review of The Oxford Textbook of Clinical Research Ethics, by D. Wendler, C. Grady, R. Crouch, R. Lie, F. Miller, and E. Emanuel

Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 33 (3):221-226 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

When is clinical research ethical? The difficulty in answering this question lies in the dual nature of research on human subjects, which yields two somewhat conflicting sets of obligations. On the one hand, there is the traditional view of science that includes the idea of an obligation to learn about the world. On the other hand, there is the obligation of care on the part of researchers towards individual participants in the research ...

Categories

Keywords

DOI

10.1007/s11017-012-9217-1

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 84,152

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The Oxford textbook of clinical research ethics.Ezekiel J. Emanuel (ed.) - 2008 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Ethical and regulatory aspects of clinical research: readings and commentary.Ezekiel J. Emanuel (ed.) - 2003 - Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Does it Matter Whether Investigators Intend to Benefit Research Subjects?David Wendler & Emily Abdoler - 2010 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 20 (4):353-370.
Medical risk and the right to an informed consent in clinical care and clinical research.Dennis John Mazur - 1998 - Tampa, Fla.: American College of Physician Executives.
Must research participants understand randomization?David Wendler - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (2):3 – 8.
Clinical Research Consultation: A Casebook.Marion Danis (ed.) - 2012 - Oxford University Press.
Rethinking the ethics of clinical research: widening the lens.Alan Wertheimer - 2011 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Bench to bedside: Mapping the moral terrain of clinical research.Steven Joffe & Franklin G. Miller - 2008 - Hastings Center Report 38 (2):30-42.
A plea for pragmatism in clinical research ethics.David H. Brendel & Franklin G. Miller - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (4):24 – 31.
The limits of consent: a socio-ethical approach to human subject research in medicine.Oonagh Corrigan (ed.) - 2009 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Refuting the net risks test: a response to Wendler and Miller's "Assessing research risks systematically".Charles Weijer & Paul B. Miller - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (8):487-490.
On using people merely as a means in clinical research.Riekeder Graaf & Johannes J. M. Delden - forthcoming - Bioethics.
Informed consent, exploitation and whether it is possible to conduct human subjects research without either one.Dave Wendler - 2000 - Bioethics 14 (4):310–339.
On using people merely as a means in clinical research.Rieke van der Graaf & Johannes J. M. van Delden - 2010 - Bioethics 26 (2):76-83.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-05-05

Downloads
46 (#277,907)

6 months
1 (#511,323)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Roger Stanev
University of Ottawa

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references