Response independence, matching and maximizing: A reply to Heyman

&
Psychological Review 86 (5):501-505 (1979)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/0033-295x.86.5.501

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Matching and maximizing in concurrent schedules.Gene M. Heyman - 1979 - Psychological Review 86 (5):496-500.
On matching and maximizing in operant choice experiments.J. E. Staddon & Susan Motheral - 1978 - Psychological Review 85 (5):436-444.
"On Matching and Maximizing in Operant Choice Experiments": Correction.J. E. R. Staddon & Susan Motheral - 1979 - Psychological Review 86 (2):156-156.
Introducing a Method for Calculating the Allocation of Attention in a Cognitive “Two-Armed Bandit” Procedure: Probability Matching Gives Way to Maximizing.Gene M. Heyman, Katherine A. Grisanzio & Victor Liang - 2016 - Frontiers in Psychology 7.
How to decide between matching and maximizing: A reply to Prelec.Howard Rachlin - 1983 - Psychological Review 90 (4):376-379.
Deductive reasoning and matching-bias inhibition training: Evidence from a debiasing paradigm.Sylvain Moutier, Nathalie Angeard & Olivier Houde - 2002 - Thinking and Reasoning 8 (3):205 – 224.
Matching, maximizing, and the hyperbolic reinforcement feedback function.Dražen Prelec - 1982 - Psychological Review 89 (3):189-230.
Can Bohmian mechanics be made background independent?Antonio Vassallo - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 52 (Part B):242-250.
Matching versus maximizing: Comments on Prelec's paper.John H. Kagel, Raymond C. Battalio & Leonard Green - 1983 - Psychological Review 90 (4):380-384.
Context, goal, utility, and relevance: A reply to Evans (2002) considering Oaksford (2002).Hiroshi Yama - 2002 - Thinking and Reasoning 8 (3):225 – 230.
Reply to Gale's review.Bruce Langtry - manuscript
Analysis of "physical" matching task for simultaneously presented pairs of letters.Maurice Hershenson & Kenneth P. Price - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 97 (2):198.
On the existence of fair matching algorithms.F. Masarani & S. S. Gokturk - 1989 - Theory and Decision 26 (3):305-322.
Stimulus itensity and the asymmetrical matching principle.Sandra Harris & E. Neil Murray - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 84 (2):257.
Universality Revisited.Nicole L. Nelson & James A. Russell - 2013 - Emotion Review 5 (1):8-15.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
8 (#1,249,165)

6 months
7 (#350,235)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references