Philosophy and Social Criticism 39 (8):793-807 (2013)

Authors
Andrea Staiti
Boston College
Abstract
In this article I argue that new light can be shed on the analytic/Continental divide by looking at the controversy on the nature of philosophy in late 19th-century/early-20th-century Germany. The controversy is between those thinkers who understand philosophy primarily as a worldview [Weltanschauung] and those who insist that it should be understood as a science [Wissenschaft]. The positions of the two main representatives of the two camps, Wilhelm Dilthey and Heinrich Rickert, are presented and assessed. Their mutual disagreement on what philosophy ought to be reflects in a striking way some of the major tensions existing between the analytic and the Continental camps today. At the end of the article I formulate a historical hypothesis about how the Wissenschaft/Weltanschauung controversy petrified into the analytic/Continental divide
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1177/0191453713494972
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,008
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Nature and Future of Philosophy.Michael Dummett - 2010 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 16 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Educational Value of Analytic Philosophy.Jane Gatley - 2021 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 7 (1):59-77.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Whose Fault? The Origins and Evitability of the Analytic–Continental Rift.Peter Simons - 2001 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 9 (3):295 – 311.
From a Continental Point of View: The Role of Logic in the Analytic-Continental Divide.Franca D'Agostini - 2001 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 9 (3):349 – 367.
What is Continental Philosophy?Simon Critchley - 1997 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 5 (3):347 – 363.
Continental Philosophy and Chickening Out: A Reply to Simon Glendinning.Jack Reynolds - 2009 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17 (2):255-72.
Continental Philosophy of Science.Babette Babich - 2007 - In Constantin Boundas (ed.), The Edinburgh Companion to the Twentieth Century Philosophies. Edinburgh. University of Edinburgh Press. pp. 545--558.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-08-01

Total views
29 ( #394,172 of 2,505,156 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,587 of 2,505,156 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes