Husserl Studies 31 (2):123-141 (2015)

Authors
Andrea Staiti
University of Parma
Abstract
In this paper I criticize Claude Romano’s recent characterization of Husserl’s phenomenology as a form of Cartesianism. Contra Romano, Husserl is not committed to the view that since individual things in the world are dubitable, then the world as a whole is dubitable. On the contrary, for Husserl doubt is a merely transitional phenomenon which can only characterize a temporary span of experience. Similarly, illusion is not a mode of experience in its own right but a retrospective way of characterizing a span of experience. Therefore, Husserl cannot be plausibly characterized as either a disjunctivist or a conjunctivist. The common premise of both theories – namely, that perception and illusion are two classes of conscious acts standing on equal footing – is phenomenologically unsound. I propose to call Husserl’s theory a hermeneutical theory of perception, i.e., one that interprets perception as a temporal and self-correcting process. In the last part of the paper I argue that Husserl’s positive appraisal of Cartesian doubt is only pedagogical in nature. Husserl does not take Cartesian doubt to be practicable, but the attempt to doubt universally has the positive effect of revealing transcendental subjectivity as the subject matter of phenomenology
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s10743-014-9164-y
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,248
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Husserl’s philosophical estrangement from the conjunctivism-disjunctivism debate.Andrea Cimino - 2020 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 20 (4):743-779.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Must Phenomenology Remain Cartesian?Claude Romano - 2012 - Continental Philosophy Review 45 (3):425-445.
Husserl: An Analysis of His Phenomenology.Paul Ricœur - 1967 - Northwestern University Press.
Husserl y Las Aporías de la Intersubjetividad.Stâle R. S. Finke - 1993 - Anuario Filosófico 26 (2):327-360.
The Horizon of the Self: Husserl on Indexicals.Denis Fisette - 1998 - In Dan Zahavi (ed.), Self-Awareness, Temporality, and Alterity. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 119-135.
Common Sense.Barry Smith - 1995 - In Barry Smith & David Woodruff Smith (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Husserl. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 394-437.
Transcendental Subjectivity and the Human Being.Hanne Jacobs - 2014 - In Sara Heinämaa Mirja Hartimo & Timo Miettinen (eds.), Phenomenology and the Transcendental. Routledge. pp. 87-105.
Barry Smith.Common Sense - 1995 - In Barry Smith & David W. Smith (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Husserl. Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-11-25

Total views
55 ( #208,225 of 2,518,495 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #271,901 of 2,518,495 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes