Machine learning and its impact on psychiatric nosology: Findings from a qualitative study among German and Swiss experts

Philosophy and the Mind Sciences 4 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The increasing integration of Machine Learning (ML) techniques into clinical care, driven in particular by Deep Learning (DL) using Artificial Neural Nets (ANNs), promises to reshape medical practice on various levels and across multiple medical fields. Much recent literature examines the ethical consequences of employing ML within medical and psychiatric practice but the potential impact on psychiatric diagnostic systems has so far not been well-developed. In this article, we aim to explore the challenges that arise from the recent use of ANNs for the old problems of psychiatric nosology. To enable an empirically supported critical reflection on the topic, we conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with Swiss and German experts in computational psychiatry. Here, we report our findings structured around two themes, namely (1) the possibility of using ML for defining or refining of psychiatric classification, and (2) the desirability of employing ML for psychiatric nosology. We discuss these themes by relating them to recent debates about network theory for psychiatric nosology and show why empirical research in the field should critically reflect on its contribution to psychopathology research. In sum, we argue that beyond technical, regulatory, and ethical challenges, philosophical reflection is crucial to harness the potential of ML in psychiatry.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Validity of Psychiatric Nosology.Claire Louise Pouncey - 2001 - Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania
The 19th-century nosology of alienism: history and epistemology.German E. Berrios - 2012 - In Kenneth S. Kendler & Josef Parnas (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Psychiatry Ii: Nosology. Oxford University Press. pp. 101.
A logical-pragmatic perspective on validity.Adriano C. T. Rodrigues & Claudio E. M. Banzato - 2009 - Dialogues in Philosophy, Mental and Neuro Sciences 2 (2):40-44.
Psychiatric Research Ethics.Dominic Sisti & William R. Smith - 2020 - In Ana S. Iltis & Douglas MacKay (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Research Ethics. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press.
Semantic Vagueness in Psychiatric Nosology.Nicholas Tilmes - 2022 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 29 (3):169-178.
Recent criticism of psychiatric nosology: a review.Jennifer Radden - 1994 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 1 (3):193-200.
Seeing sense in psychiatric diagnoses.Paul R. McHugh - 2012 - In Kenneth S. Kendler & Josef Parnas (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Psychiatry Ii: Nosology. Oxford University Press. pp. 213.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-04-12

Downloads
9 (#1,080,087)

6 months
5 (#247,092)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references