Making it articulated

Mind and Language 17 (1-2):149–168 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I argue in favor of the view that all the constituents of the propositions hearers would intuitively believe to be expressed by utterances are the result of assigning values to the elements of the sentence uttered, and combining them in accord with its structure. The way I accomplish this is by questioning the existence of some of the processes that theorists have claimed underlie the provision of constituents to the propositions recovered by hearers in linguistic interpretation, processes that apparently bypass assigning these constituents to elements of the logical form of the expression uttered.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
219 (#87,853)

6 months
15 (#145,565)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jason Stanley
Yale University

Citations of this work

Names Are Predicates.Delia Graff Fara - 2015 - Philosophical Review 124 (1):59-117.
The Radical Account of Bare Plural Generics.Anthony Nguyen - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 177 (5):1303-1331.
Unarticulated constituents.François Recanati - 2002 - Linguistics and Philosophy 25 (3):299-345.
Semantics, pragmatics, and the role of semantic content.Jeffrey C. King & Jason Stanley - 2005 - In Zoltan Gendler Szabo (ed.), Semantics Versus Pragmatics. Oxford University Press. pp. 111--164.

View all 85 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references