Habermas and the Project of Immanent Critique

Constellations 20 (4):533-552 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

According to Jürgen Habermas, his Theory of Communicative Action offers a new account of the normative foundations of critical theory. Habermas’ motivating insight is that neither a transcendental nor a metaphysical solution to the problem of normativity, nor a merely hermeneutic reconstruction of historically given norms, is sufficient to clarify the normative foundations of critical theory. In response to this insight, Habermas develops a novel account of normativity, which locates the normative demands of critical theory within the socially instituted practice of communicative understanding. Although Habermas has claimed otherwise, this new foundation for critical theory constitutes a novel and innovative form of “immanent critique.” To argue for and to clarify this claim, I offer, in section 1, a formal account of immanent critique and distinguish between two different ways of carrying out such a critique.

Similar books and articles

Rethinking the Critique of Instrumental Reason.Roger Foster - 2006 - Social Philosophy Today 22:169-184.
Pierre bourdieu’s critique of scholarly reason.Roger Foster - 2005 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 31 (1):89-107.
On Habermas’s Critique of Husserl.Matheson Russell - 2011 - Husserl Studies 27 (1):41-62.
Worlds apart?: Habermas and Levinas.Arne Johan Vetlesen - 1997 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 23 (1):1-20.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-12

Downloads
1,142 (#10,447)

6 months
102 (#36,919)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Titus Stahl
University of Groningen

Citations of this work

Why immanent critique?Sanford Diehl - 2021 - European Journal of Philosophy 30 (2):676-692.
The Conditions of Immanent Critique.Alexei Procyshyn - 2022 - Critical Horizons 23 (1):22-43.
Was ist orthodoxe Kritische Theorie?Fabian Freyenhagen - 2017 - Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 65 (3):456-469.

View all 15 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

A reply to my critics.Jurgen Habermas - 2010 - In James Gordon Finlayson & Fabian Freyenhagen (eds.), Habermas and Rawls: Disputing the Political. Rouledge.
Reason, recognition, and internal critique.Antti Kauppinen - 2002 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 45 (4):479 – 498.
The Colonization Thesis: Habermas on Reification.Timo Jütten - 2011 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 19 (5):701 - 727.
The Critique of Impure Reason.Thomas McCarthy - 1990 - Political Theory 18 (3):437-469.

Add more references