Context, interest relativity and the sorites

Analysis 63 (4):269–281 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

According to what I will call a contextualist solution to the sorites paradox, vague terms are context-sensitive, and one can give a convincing dissolution of the sorites paradox in terms of this context-dependency. The reason, according to the contextualist, that precise boundaries for expressions like “heap” or “tall for a basketball player” are so difficult to detect is that when two entities are sufficiently similar (or saliently similar), we tend to shift the interpretation of the vague expression so that if one counts as falling in the extension of the property expressed by that expression, so does the other. As a consequence, when we look for the boundary of the extension of a vague expression in its penumbra, our very looking has the effect of changing the interpretation of the vague expression so that the boundary is not where we are looking. This accounts for the persuasive force of sorites arguments

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Vagueness without context change.Rosanna Keefe - 2007 - Mind 116 (462):275-292.
Higher-Order Sorites Paradox.Elia Zardini - 2013 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 42 (1):25-48.
Vague terms, indexicals, and vague indexicals.Joshua Gert - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 140 (3):437 - 445.
Qualia and vagueness.Anthony Everett - 1996 - Synthese 106 (2):205-226.
Strict Finitism and the Happy Sorites.Ofra Magidor - 2012 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 41 (2):471-491.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
298 (#62,108)

6 months
21 (#100,860)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jason Stanley
Yale University

Citations of this work

Nonindexical contextualism.John MacFarlane - 2009 - Synthese 166 (2):231-250.
Minimal Truthmakers.Donnchadh O'Conaill & Tuomas E. Tahko - 2016 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (2):228-244.
Semantics, pragmatics, and the role of semantic content.Jeffrey C. King & Jason Stanley - 2005 - In Zoltan Gendler Szabo (ed.), Semantics Versus Pragmatics. Oxford University Press. pp. 111--164.
Transparency and the Context-Sensitivity of Attitude Reports.Cian Dorr - 2014 - In Manuel García-Carpintero & Genoveva Martí (eds.), Empty Representations: Reference and Non-Existence. Oxford University Press. pp. 25-66.

View all 44 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Understanding Truth.Scott Soames - 1998 - Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press USA.
On Quantifier Domain Restriction.Jason Stanley & Zoltán Gendler Szabó - 2000 - Mind and Language 15 (2-3):219--61.
Context and logical form.Jason Stanley - 2000 - Linguistics and Philosophy 23 (4):391--434.
Vagueness without paradox.Diana Raffman - 1994 - Philosophical Review 103 (1):41-74.
Shifting Sands.Delia Graff - 2000 - Philosophical Topics 28 (1):45-81.

View all 12 references / Add more references