Improving access to essential medicines: How health concerns can be prioritised in the global governance system

Public Health Ethics 1 (2):83-88 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Dr Devi Sridhar, Department of Politics and International relations, University of Oxford, All Souls College, High St, OX1 4AL UK, Email: devi.sridhar{at}politics.ox.ac.uk ' + u + '@' + d + ' '//--> Abstract This paper discusses the politics of access to essential medicines and identifies ‘space’ in the current system where health concerns can be strengthened relative to trade. This issue is addressed from a global governance perspective focusing on the main actors who can have the greatest impact. These include developing country coalitions and citizens in developed countries though participation in civil society organisations. These actors have combined forces to tackle this issue successfully, resulting in the 2001 Doha Declaration on Public Health. The collaboration has been so powerful due to the assistance of the media as well as the decision to compromise with pharmaceutical companies and their host countries. To improve access to essential medicines, six C's are needed: coalitions, civil society, citizenship, compromise, communication and collaboration. CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us What's this?

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-12-21

Downloads
69 (#228,339)

6 months
25 (#108,197)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Access to medicines.Thomas Pogge - 2008 - Public Health Ethics 1 (2):73-82.
Specifying Rights: the Case of TRIPS.G. Collste - 2011 - Public Health Ethics 4 (1):63-69.
Special Issue: Access to Medicines.T. Pogge - 2008 - Public Health Ethics 1 (2):73-82.

Add more citations