Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (2):179-184 (2004)
Abstract“Dissecting Bioethics,” edited by Tuija Takala and Matti Häyry, welcomes contributions on the conceptual and theoretical dimensions of bioethics.The section is dedicated to the idea that words defined by bioethicists and others should not be allowed to imprison people's actual concerns, emotions, and thoughts. Papers that expose the many meanings of a concept, describe the different readings of a moral doctrine, or provide an alternative angle to seemingly self-evident issues are therefore particularly appreciated.The themes covered in the section so far include dignity, naturalness, public interest, community, disability, autonomy, parity of reasoning, symbolic appeals, and toleration.All submitted papers are peer reviewed. To submit a paper or to discuss a suitable topic, contact Tuija Takala at [email protected]
Similar books and articles
Safety and the True–True Problem.Jon Cogburn & Jeffrey W. Roland - 2013 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 94 (2):246-267.
Mmountains Are Just Mountains.Jay Garfield - 2009 - In Mario D'Amato, Jay L. Garfield & Tom J. F. Tillemans (eds.), Pointing at the Moon: Buddhism, Logic, Analytic Philosophy. Oxford University Press. pp. 71--82.
True Belief and Knowledge Revisited.John Peterson - 1996 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 52 (1):127-135.
A Strengthened Ethical Version of Moore's Paradox? Lived Paradoxes of Self-Loathing in Psychosis and Neurosis.Rupert Read - 2012 - Philosophical Psychology 25 (1):133 - 141.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Confrontations in “Genethics”: Rationalities, Challenges, and Methodological Responses.John Coggon - 2011 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 20 (1):46-55.
The Grand Leap of the Whale Up the Niagara Falls.Søren Holm - 2015 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 24 (2):195-203.
References found in this work
No references found.