What Was Wrong with Abercrombie & Fitch's “Magalog”?1

Business and Society Review 111 (4):387-408 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,038

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Knowability and the capacity to know.Michael Fara - 2010 - Synthese 173 (1):53 - 73.
Getting and spending1.Nicholas Abercrombie - 2000 - Cultural Values 4 (3):374-382.
Abstraction in Fitch's Basic Logic.Eric Thomas Updike - 2012 - History and Philosophy of Logic 33 (3):215-243.
Book Reviews. [REVIEW]Nicholas Abercrombie - 1988 - Theory, Culture and Society 5 (1):177-178.
Interpreting Mannheim.Nicholas Abercrombie & Brian Longhurst - 1983 - Theory, Culture and Society 2 (1):5-15.
Sociological indexicality.Nicholas Abercrombie - 1974 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 4 (1):89–95.
Fitch's proof, verificationism, and the knower paradox.J. C. Beall - 2000 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 78 (2):241 – 247.
Fitch's Argument and Typing Knowledge.Alexander Paseau - 2008 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 49 (2):153-176.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-23

Downloads
15 (#948,202)

6 months
2 (#1,200,830)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Earl Spurgin
John Carroll University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references