Occupational Safety and Paternalism: Machan Revisited

Journal of Business Ethics 63 (2):155-173 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In 1987, Machan provided a libertarian case against the right to occupational safety. Since before Machan’s essay appeared, many business ethicists and legal scholars have given considerable attention to the overall position Machan endorses: the acceptance of employment at will and the rejection of employee rights. No one yet has given adequate attention, however, to the fact that Machan’s argument against the right to occupational safety actually stands or falls independently of his overall position on employee rights. His argument ultimately rests on two values: the promotion of employee interests and anti-paternalism. Insofar as those who support the right to occupational safety share those values, they must find a strategy for opposing Machan’s argument that preserves those values. In this paper, I demonstrate why Machan’s argument ultimately rests on the promotion of employee interests and anti-paternalism. Then, I develop an objection to Machan’s argument that preserves those values.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Human rights, workers' rights, and the “right” to occupational safety.Tibor R. Machan - forthcoming - Moral Rights in the Workplace, Albany, Ny: State University of New York Press, as Reprinted in White, Ti (1993). Business Ethics: A Philosophical Reader. New York: Macmillan.
Occupational Safety and Health Act … and the Hospital.Barbara Atz - 1975 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 3 (3):6-8.
The FDA, Preemption, and Public Safety.Lawrence O. Gostin - 2011 - Hastings Center Report 41 (5):11-12.
Occupational safety and health.Bridget M. Hutter - 2010 - In Peter Cane & Herbert M. Kritzer (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research. Oxford University Press.
Anarchosurrealism Revisited Reply to Feyerabend's Comments.Tibor R. Machan - 1982 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 12 (2):197-199.
Anarchosurrealism Revisited Reply to Feyerabend's Comments.Tibor R. Machan - 1982 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 12 (2):197-199.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
63 (#257,501)

6 months
9 (#314,693)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Earl Spurgin
John Carroll University

References found in this work

Anarchy, State, and Utopia.Robert Nozick - 1974 - New York: Basic Books.
Paternalism.Gerald Dworkin - 1972 - The Monist 56 (1):64-84.
Nicomachean Ethics.Martin Aristotle & Ostwald - 1911 - New York: Hackett Publishing Company. Edited by C. C. W. Taylor.
Ethical Issues in Business: A Philosophical Approach.Thomas Donaldson & Patricia Hogue Werhane (eds.) - 2002 - Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson/Prentice Hall.

View all 30 references / Add more references