- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
When "risk" and "benefit" are open to interpretation - as is generally the case
American Journal of Bioethics 7 (3):17 – 19 (2007)
Abstract
This Article does not have an abstractOther Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Subject Protection and the Risk–Benefit Relationship.Toby L. Schonfeld, Joseph S. Brown & Bruce G. Gordon - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (5):22 – 23.
When can children with conditions be in no-benefit, higher-Hazard pediatric studies?Loretta M. Kopelman - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (3):15 – 17.
The risky business of assessing research risk.Alexander A. Kon - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (3):21 – 22.
On not taking objective risk assessments at face value.Rachel A. Ankeny & Ian Kerridge - 2004 - American Journal of Bioethics 4 (3):35 – 37.
Is risky pediatric research without prospect of direct benefit ever justified?Rebecca A. Martin & Jason Scott Robert - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (3):12 – 15.
Creating non-human persons: Might it be worth the risk?Jason T. Eberl - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (5):52 – 54.
An Attempt to Shut Down Discourse About a Controversial Practice Will Not Benefit Patients, Human Subjects, the Bioethics Community, or the Research Community.Anne Tamar-Mattis - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (9):64-66.
Does Research Ethics Rest on a Mistake? The Common Good, Reasonable Risk and Social Justice.Alex John London - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (1):37 – 39.
Response to open Peer commentaries on "neuroethics and national security".Turhan Canli, Susan Brandon, William Casebeer, Philip J. Crowley, Don DuRousseau, Henry T. Greely & Alvaro Pascual-Leones - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (5):W1 – W3.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
37 (#496,465)
6 months
11 (#246,537)
2009-01-28
Downloads
37 (#496,465)
6 months
11 (#246,537)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
MRI Research Proposals Involving Child Subjects: Concerns Hindering Research Ethics Boards from Approving Them and a Checklist to Help Evaluate Them.J. Deborah Shiloff, Bryan Magwood & Krisztina L. Malisza - 2011 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 20 (1):115-129.
References found in this work
Minimal risk as an international ethical standard in research.Loretta M. Kopelman - 2004 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (3):351 – 378.
Determining Risk in Pediatric Research with No Prospect of Direct Benefit: Time for a National Consensus on the Interpretation of Federal Regulations.Celia B. Fisher - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (3):5-10.
Children as Research Subjects: A Dilemma.Loretta M. Kopelman - 2000 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (6):723-744.
Children as Research Subjects: A Dilemma.Loretta M. Kopelman - 2000 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (6):745-764.
Canaries in the mines: children, risk, non-therapeutic research, and justice.M. Spriggs - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (2):176-181.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5d8df9484f-2n7kc uwo