- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The voice of experience
Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (1):33-44 (1998)
Abstract
Whistleblowing is recognized as an important function in promoting scientific integrity, and there is a recognized need to protect whistleblowers. There is not much information available in the literature about scientific whistleblowing. Because it appears that frequently scientific misconduct is uncovered by a whistleblower, it is useful to obtain more information about the activity. This paper is about whistleblowing from the perspective of the person blowing the whistle. Information about a few selected cases of whistleblowing is presented in an attempt to augment the experiential aspect of the activity.My notes
Similar books and articles
Whistleblowing: A very unpleasant avocation.Robert L. Sprague - 1993 - Ethics and Behavior 3 (1):103 – 133.
Whistleblowing and scientific misconduct: Renewing legal and virtue ethics foundations.Thomas Alured Faunce - unknown
Whistleblowing and organizational social responsibility: a global assessment.Wim Vandekerckhove - 2006 - Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
Comments on “the psychology of whistleblowing” (j.E. Sieber) and “the voice of experience” (r.L. Sprague).Vivian Weil - 1998 - Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (1):29-31.
Ethical judgment and whistleblowing intention: Examining the moderating role of locus of control. [REVIEW]Randy K. Chiu - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 43 (1-2):65-74.
A preliminary investigation of the relationship between selected organizational characteristics and external whistleblowing by employees.Tim Barnett - 1992 - Journal of Business Ethics 11 (12):949 - 959.
Whistleblowing and employee loyalty.Robert A. Larmer - 1992 - Journal of Business Ethics 11 (2):125 - 128.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
66 (#240,625)
6 months
8 (#352,434)
2009-01-28
Downloads
66 (#240,625)
6 months
8 (#352,434)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The fallout: What happens to whistleblowers and those accused but exonerated of scientific misconduct?James S. Lubalin & Jennifer L. Matheson - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):229-250.
Comments on “the psychology of whistleblowing” (j.E. Sieber) and “the voice of experience” (r.L. Sprague).Vivian Weil - 1998 - Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (1):29-31.
On sprague’s “The voice of experience”.Taft H. Broome - 1998 - Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (1):45-50.
Comments on “the psychology of whistleblowing” (J.E. Sieber) and “the voice of experience” (R.L. Sprague).Professor Vivian Weil - 1998 - Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (1):29-31.
References found in this work
The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine.George L. Engel - 1977 - Science 196:129-136.
Whistleblowing and Professional Responsibility.Sissela Bok - 1980 - New York University Education Quarterly 11 (4):2-10.
Whistleblowing: A very unpleasant avocation.Robert L. Sprague - 1993 - Ethics and Behavior 3 (1):103 – 133.
Legal Protections for the Scientific Misconduct Whistleblower.Peter Poon - 1995 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 23 (1):88-95.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-5tf24 uwo