Utilitas 3 (1):37-51 (1991)
Abstract |
My purpose in what follows is not so much to defend the basic principle of utilitarianism as to indicate the form of it which seems most promising as a basic moral and political position. I shall take the principle of utility as offering a criterion for two different sorts of evaluation: first, the merits of acts of government, social policies, and social institutions, and secondly, the ultimate moral evaluation of the actions of individuals. I do not take it as implying that the individual should live his life on the basis of constant evaluations of this sort. For there are different levels of decision making each with its appropriate criteria. For example, we each inevitably make many of our decisions from the point of view of our own personal self-fulfilment and this cannot regularly take a directly utilitarian form, nor should the utilitarian want it to do so. His claim is at most that we should sometimes review our life from the point of view of a kind of impersonal moral truth of a universalistic utilitarian character.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1017/S0953820800000844 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Well-Being: Its Meaning, Measurement and Moral Importance.James Griffin & Richard Warner - 1989 - Ethics 99 (3):625-636.
Citations of this work BETA
Happiness and Pleasure.Daniel M. Haybron - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62 (3):501-528.
On Being Happy or Unhappy.Daniel M. Haybron - 2005 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (2):287–317.
What Do We Want From a Theory of Happiness&Quest.Daniel M. Haybron - 2003 - Metaphilosophy 34 (3):305-329.
View all 8 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
The Greatest Happiness Principle and Other Early German Anticipations of Utilitarian Theory.Joachim Hruschka - 1991 - Utilitas 3 (2):165.
A Non-Utilitarian Approach to Punishment.H. J. McCloskey - 1965 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 8 (1-4):249 – 263.
Obedience to Rules and Berkeley's Theological Utilitarianism.Matti Häyry & Heta Häyry - 1994 - Utilitas 6 (2):233.
Maximization and Equality: An Examination of Utilitarian Responses to Rawls and Other Critics.Joon Ho Kang - 2003 - Dissertation, Purdue University
Bentham's Equality-Sensitive Utilitarianism: Gerald J. Postema.Gerald J. Postema - 1998 - Utilitas 10 (2):144-158.
Mill's Harm Principle as Social Justice.Huodong Li - 2004 - Dissertation, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale
Utilitarianism: A Standard of Rightness or a Decision Procedure.Joon Ho Kang - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 10:221-228.
A Utilitarian Reply to Dr. McCloskey.T. L. S. Sprigge - 1965 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 8 (1-4):264 – 291.
Individual Sacrifice and the Greatest Happiness: Bentham on Utility and Rights: F. Rosen.F. Rosen - 1998 - Utilitas 10 (2):129-143.
J.S. Mill and the Diversity of Utilitarianism.Daniel Jacobson - 2003 - Philosophers' Imprint 3:1-18.
A Critical Analysis Of Act Utilitarianism And Rule Utilitarianism.Ya-hui Su - 2008 - Philosophy and Culture 35 (12):137-149.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2010-08-30
Total views
137 ( #84,220 of 2,499,615 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #418,166 of 2,499,615 )
2010-08-30
Total views
137 ( #84,220 of 2,499,615 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #418,166 of 2,499,615 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads