Species intelligibilis: from perception to knowledge

New York: Brill (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

v. 1. Classical roots and medieval discussions -- v. 2. Renaissance controversis, later scholasticism, and the elimination of the intelligible species in modern philosophy.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Species concepts should not conflict with evolutionary history, but often do.Joel D. Velasco - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 39 (4):407-414.
Primary and secondary qualities: the historical and ongoing debate.Lawrence Nolan (ed.) - 2011 - Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Dretske and his critics.Brian P. McLaughlin (ed.) - 1991 - Cambridge, Mass., USA: Blackwell.
The individual and the cosmos in Renaissance philosophy.Ernst Cassirer - 1963 - Mineola, N.Y.: Dover Publications. Edited by Mario Domandi.
Oxford realism: Knowledge and perception I.Mathieu Marion - 2000 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 8 (2):299 – 338.
Oxford realism: Knowledge and perception II.Mathieu Marion - 2000 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 8 (3):485 – 519.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
77 (#211,913)

6 months
4 (#800,606)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references