Idealistic Studies 16 (3):229-235 (1986)

Moore’s essay, “The Refutation of Idealism,” contains a nice illustration of his helping philosophers to see a fact, by removing the obscuring veils that philosophers themselves have spun. Long after he wrote it, Moore called the essay “very confused.” Yet I think that it is one of Moore’s most important papers, a first tentative effort in a series that includes “A Defence of Common Sense” and “Proof of an External World.” I shall not attempt to establish that large claim here. What I want to do is to throw some light on one part of “The Refutation of Idealism.” The distinctive part to be considered follows Moore’s asking the question, “What is a sensation or idea?” on page 17, and runs to near the bottom of page 26. There is much in these pages; but I shall attend only to a certain strand of thought that runs through them: Moore’s analysis of the sensation of blue.
Keywords Continental Philosophy  History of Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0046-8541
DOI 10.5840/idstudies198616337
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 72,577
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Philosophy of G. E. Moore.Paul Arthur Schilpp - 1942 - New York: Tudor Pub. Co..
G. E. Moore: Making the Reader See.Elmer Sprague - 1986 - Idealistic Studies 16 (3):229-235.
Analysis and Life.F. C. T. Moore - 2003 - In Jorge J. E. Gracia, Gregory M. Reichberg & Bernard N. Schumacher (eds.), The Classics of Western Philosophy: A Reader's Guide. Blackwell. pp. 467.
How to Reid Moore.John Greco - 2002 - Philosophical Quarterly 52 (209):544-563.
Scanlon Versus Moore on Goodness.Philip Stratton-Lake & Brad Hooker - 2006 - In Terry Horgan & Mark Timmons (eds.), Metaethics After Moore. Oxford University Press. pp. 149.
Mill, Moore, and Intrinsic Value.Guy Fletcher - 2008 - Social Theory and Practice 34 (4):517-32.
What's Wrong with Moore's Argument?James Pryor - 2004 - Philosophical Issues 14 (1):349–378.
Moore's Paradox.Krista Lawlor & John Perry - 2008 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 86 (3):421 – 427.
Another Biofuel Blunder in the Making?Andrew Moore - 2009 - Bioessays 31 (4):369-369.
Varieties of Sense‐Making.A. W. Moore - 2013 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 37 (1):1-10.


Added to PP index

Total views
4 ( #1,286,609 of 2,533,616 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #163,878 of 2,533,616 )

How can I increase my downloads?


Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes