Monash Bioethics Review 28 (4):32-1 (2009)
AbstractSocial networking sites such as MySpace and virtual communities such as on-line support groups can be a rich source of data for researchers. These sites can be an effective way of reaching and researching young people in order to address their particular health needs. Internet-based research is also potentially risky and exploitative. There is some guidance for conducting research online, but there are no detailed or universally accepted ethics guidelines for research of webspaces such as MySpace or virtual communities in which young people participate. One question that arises is — If MySpace is a public webspace, can research be done without consent? In this paper I investigate ethical issues surrounding young people’s consent in cyber research. I identify issues that help determine whether consent is needed, offer suggestions for dealing with consent in cyberspace and add my voice to the call for a resource of case studies — indispensible in the development of guidelines and the education of researchers and research ethics committees.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
Idealist Origins: 1920s and Before.Martin Davies & Stein Helgeby - 2014 - In Graham Oppy & Nick Trakakis (eds.), History of Philosophy in Australia and New Zealand. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. pp. 15-54.
Similar books and articles
Ethical Practice in Internet Research Involving Vulnerable People: Lessons From a Self-Harm Discussion Forum Study (SharpTalk).S. Sharkey, R. Jones, J. Smithson, E. Hewis, T. Emmens, T. Ford & C. Owens - 2011 - Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (12):752-758.
Consent in School-Based Research Involving Children and Young People: A Survey of Research From Systematic Reviews.R. W. Rees, J. Garcia & A. Oakley - 2007 - Research Ethics 3 (2):35-39.
Including Adults with Intellectual Disabilities Who Lack Capacity to Consent in Research.Julie Calveley - 2012 - Nursing Ethics 19 (4):558-567.
The Tri-Council Policy Statement and Research in Cyberspace: Research Ethics, the Internet, and Revising a 'Living Document'. [REVIEW]Heather A. Kitchin - 2003 - Journal of Academic Ethics 1 (4):397-418.
Respecting Respect: Exploring a Great Deal.Helen M. F. Jones - 2002 - Educational Studies 28 (4):341-352.
Objects in Space As Metaphor for the Internet.Robert Boyd Skipper - 2002 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 9 (1):83-88.
Young People’s Community Engagement: What Does Research-Based and Other Literature Tell Us About Young People’s Perspectives and the Impact of Schools’ Contributions?Ian Davies, Gillian Hampden-Thompson, John Calhoun, George Bramley, Maria Tsouroufli, Vanita Sundaram, Pippa Lord & Jennifer Jeffes - 2013 - British Journal of Educational Studies 61 (3):327-343.
Reformed Consent: Adapting to New Media and Research Participant Preferences.J. Henry, B. W. Palmer, L. Palinkas, D. K. Glorioso, M. P. Caligiuri & D. V. Jeste - 2008 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 31 (2):1-8.
Broadening Consent--And Diluting Ethics?B. Hofmann - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (2):125-129.
Vulnerable Populations in Research: The Case of the Seriously Ill.Philip J. Nickel - 2006 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (3):245-264.
Risk of Disclosure of Participating in an Internet-Based HIV Behavioural Risk Study of Men Who Have Sex with Men.C. M. Khosropour & P. S. Sullivan - 2011 - Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (12):768-769.
Informed Consent and ICT-Experiments Involving Young People with Autism Spectrum Disorder–Redescribing the Problem of Dual Roles.Thomas Ploug & Søren Holm - 2012 - Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology 6 (2).