The principle of double effect as a guide for medical decision-making

Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 11 (4):465-473 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Many medical interventions have both negative and positive effects. When health care professionals cannot achieve a particular desired good result without bringing about some bad effects also they often rely on double-effect reasoning to justify their decisions. The principle of double effect is therefore an important guide for ethical decision-making in medicine. At the same time, however, it is a very controversial tool for resolving complex ethical problems that has been criticized by many authors. For these reasons, I examine in this paper whether the principle of double effect can serve as a basis for ethical decisions in medicine. The conclusion reached in this article is that even though this principle has desirable effects on clinical conduct, it is only an unreliable guide and physicians and nurses cannot feel secure in continuing to use this principle for ethical guidance

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Ethical Action Principle in Decision-Making.Kumiko Yoshitake - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 5:75-83.
Some Light on Double Effect.James G. Hanink - 1975 - Analysis 35 (5):147 - 151.
Ethical decision making and the law.Barbara Libby & Vincent Agnello - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics 26 (3):223 - 232.
Ethical Decision Making: Special or No Different? [REVIEW]Dawn R. Elm & Tara J. Radin - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 107 (3):313-329.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
38 (#397,063)

6 months
6 (#417,196)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The Principle-Based Method of Practical Ethics.Georg Spielthenner - 2017 - Health Care Analysis 25 (3):275-289.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The limits of morality.Shelly Kagan - 1989 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Intention.Roderick M. Chisholm - 1959 - Philosophical Review 68 (1):110.
The sanctity-of-life doctrine in medicine: a critique.Helga Kuhse - 1987 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The Doctrine of Double Effect: Problems of Interpretation.Nancy Davis - 2017 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 65 (2):107-123.

View all 24 references / Add more references