Providing a Medical Excuse to Organ Donor Candidates Who Feel Trapped: Concerns and Replies

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 17 (1):124-127 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Many transplant programs are willing to provide a contrived medical excuse for potential organ donors who wish to say no but feel unable to do so publicly. The availability of these excuses is thought to facilitate freedom of choice—a necessary component of informed consent—by allowing donor candidates to bow out gracefully. In a recent editorial, Simmerling et al. discuss possible harms raised by this practice and note that there is no empirical evidence to support it. Given the importance of this issue for transplant centers that accept living donors, a review of the authors' concerns is in order. After careful consideration, I conclude that although some of their points are valid, much of their analysis is flawed.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Reply to Spital's Concerns.Mary Simmerling & Joel Frader - 2008 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 17 (1):128-130.
Improving the organ donor card system in Switzerland.David Shaw - 2013 - Swiss Medical Weekly 143:w13835.
Reevaluating the Dead Donor Rule.Mike Collins - 2010 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (2):1-26.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
33 (#459,370)

6 months
8 (#292,366)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?