Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (5):861-874 (2014)

Abstract
In this article I am concerned with analogical reasoning in ethics. There is no doubt that the use of analogy can be a powerful tool in our ethical reasoning. The importance of this mode of reasoning is therefore commonly accepted, but there is considerable debate concerning how its structure should be understood and how it should be assessed, both logically and epistemically. In this paper, I first explain the basic structure of arguments from analogy in ethics. I then discuss the diversity of analogical arguments that can be found in ethics. I analyse their structure, assess them from a logical viewpoint, and show how they can be epistemically challenged and defended. The result of this investigation is that, contrary to a commonly held view, analogical reasoning can be a logically valid type of ethical reasoning that can provide reasons for action that are not worse than the reasons provided by any other kind of practical reasoning
Keywords Analogical arguments  Analogical reasoning  Analogy  Ethical reasoning  Practical reasoning
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s10677-013-9484-6
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,043
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

A Defense of Abortion.Judith Jarvis Thomson - 1971 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (1):47-66.
Active and Passive Euthanasia.James Rachels - 1975 - In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Exploring Philosophy: An Introductory Anthology. Oxford University Press.

View all 35 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Moral Consistency Reasoning Reconsidered.Norbert Paulo - 2020 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 23 (1):107-123.
Casuistry as Common Law Morality.Norbert Paulo - 2015 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 36 (6):373-389.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

In Defense of Analogical Reasoning.Steven Gamboa - 2008 - Informal Logic 28 (3):229-241.
Analogical Reasoning and Modeling in the Sciences.Paulo Abrantes - 1999 - Foundations of Science 4 (3):237-270.
Asymmetrical Analogical Arguments.J. E. Adler - 2007 - Argumentation 21 (1):83-92.
The Paradox of Analogy.David Botting - 2012 - Informal Logic 32 (1):98-115.
Situation Semantics and Models of Analogy.David H. Helman - 1986 - Philosophical Studies 49 (2):231 - 244.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-01-14

Total views
73 ( #156,129 of 2,498,735 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #422,193 of 2,498,735 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes