Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 41 (3):697-710 (2013)
AbstractThe STD experiments in Guatemala from 1946–1948 have earned a place of infamy in the history of medical ethics. But if the Guatemala STD experiments were so “ethically impossible,” how did the U.S. government approve their funding? Although much of the literature has targeted the failings of Dr. John Cutler, we focus on the institutional context and research ethos that shaped the outcome of the research. After the end of WWII, Dr. Cassius Van Slyke reconstructed the federal research contracts process into a grant program. The inaugural NIH study section recommended approval of the Guatemala STD experiments at its first meeting. The funding and oversight process of the Guatemala research was marked with serious conflicts of interest and a lack of oversight, and it was this structure, as opposed to merely a maleficent individual, that allowed the Guatemala STD experiments to proceed. We conclude that while current research regulations are designed to prevent the abuses perpetrated on the subjects of the Guatemala STD experiments, it takes a comprehensive understanding of research ethics through professional education to achieve the longstanding ideal of the responsible investigator, and ensure ethical research under any regulatory scheme
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Similar books and articles
The Rights and Wrongs of Intentional Exposure Research: Contextualising the Guatemala STD Inoculation Study.Holly Fernandez Lynch - 2012 - Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (8):513-515.
Good Ethics Can Sometimes Mean Better Science: Research Ethics and the Milgram Experiments.Dan McArthur - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (1):69-79.
The Plausibility Design, Quasi-Experiments, and Real World Research: A Case Study From the Interdisciplinary Monitoring Project for Antimalarial Combination Treatment in Tanzania.S. Patrick Kachur - 2011 - In Wenzel Geissler & Catherine Molyneux (eds.), Evidence, Ethos and Experiment: The Anthropology and History of Medical Research in Africa. Berghahn Books.
Participants' Understanding of the Process of Psychological Research: Informed Consent.Janet L. Brody, John P. Cluck & Alfredo S. Aragon - 1997 - Ethics and Behavior 7 (4):285 – 298.
The "Third Government of the Revolution" and Imperialism in Guatemala.Alfonso Bauer Paiz - 1970 - Science and Society 34 (2):146 - 165.
The Ethos and Ethics of Translational Research.Jane Maienschein, Mary Sunderland, Rachel A. Ankeny & Jason Scott Robert - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (3):43 – 51.
Ethical Review of Research on Human Subjects at Unilever: Reflections on Governance.Mark Sheehan, Vernon Marti & Tony Roberts - 2014 - Bioethics 28 (6):284-292.
Nature’s Experiments and Natural Experiments in the Social Sciences.Mary Morgan - 2013 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 43 (3):341-357.
Use of the Labour-Intensive Method in the Repair of a Rural Road Serving an Indigenous Community in Jocotán (Guatemala).Rodrigo Ares, José-María Fuentes, Eutiquio Gallego, Francisco Ayuga & Ana-Isabel García - 2012 - Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (2):315-338.
A Case History of U. S. Subversion: Guatemala, 1954.Max Gordon - 1971 - Science and Society 35 (2):129 - 155.
Oversight of Research Involving the Dead.Mark R. Wicclair & Michael DeVita - 2004 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 14 (2):143-164.
Adaptations of Christianity Among the Jacalteca Indians of Guatemala.Oliver LaFarge - 1927 - Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 2 (3):476-495.