Merricks vs. the Russellian Orthodoxy

Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 93 (2):469-477 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Many Russellians endorse the theses that propositions (i) are structured, (ii) have logical forms, (iii) have objects they are directly about as constituents, (iv) cannot exist without their constituents and (v) exist contingently. In his Propositions, Merricks argues against (i)-(v). I respond to his arguments.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-09-08

Downloads
58 (#270,773)

6 months
10 (#251,846)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jeff Speaks
University of Notre Dame

References found in this work

Propositional Content.Peter Hanks - 2015 - Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
New Thinking About Propositions.Jeffrey C. King, Scott Soames & Jeff Speaks - 2014 - New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press. Edited by Scott Soames & Jeffrey Speaks.
Rethinking Language, Mind, and Meaning.Scott Soames - 2015 - Princeton University Press.
Nonexistence.Nathan Salmon - 1998 - Noûs 32 (3):277-319.
Hylomorphism.Mark Johnston - 2006 - Journal of Philosophy 103 (12):652-698.

View all 17 references / Add more references