Is Technology Good for Us? A Eudaimonic Meta-Model for Evaluating the Contributive Capability of Technologies for a Good Life

NanoEthics 5 (3):335-343 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The title refers to the question addressed in this paper, namely, to what degree if any technology, including nanotechnologies, in the form of products and processes, is capable of contributing to a good life. To answer that question, the paper will develop a meta-normative model whose primary purpose is to determine the essential conditions that any normative theory of the Good Life and Technology (T-GLAT) must adequately address in order to be able to account for, explain and evaluate the Contributive Capability of Technology for a Good Life (CCT-GL). By CCT-GL understand the capability of any technological product or process in its design and/or its use to contribute in some way, if any, to the good life of individuals and society at large. In this paper, the all-embracing term “technology” will be used to refer to both the products and processes of different technologies.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Technology and the good life?Eric Higgs, Andrew Light & David Strong (eds.) - 2000 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
The Good life and the human good.Ellen Frankel Paul, Fred Dycus Miller & Jeffrey Paul (eds.) - 1992 - New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.
Understanding What’s Good for Us.Michael J. Zimmerman - 2009 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12 (4):429 - 439.
The quality of work life — the volvo experience.Berth Jönsson - 1982 - Journal of Business Ethics 1 (2):119 - 126.
Virilio, War and Technology: Some Critical Reflections.Douglas Kellner - 1999 - Theory, Culture and Society 16 (5-6):103-125.
The Good Cause Account of the Meaning of Life.Aaron Smuts - 2013 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 51 (4):536-562.
Why we need better ethics for emerging technologies.James H. Moor - 2005 - Ethics and Information Technology 7 (3):111-119.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-03

Downloads
74 (#215,284)

6 months
8 (#292,366)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Edward Spence
University of Sydney

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Socrates, ironist and moral philosopher.Gregory Vlastos - 1991 - Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Socrates: Ironist and Moral Philosopher.Gregory Vlastos - 1991 - Ithaca, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.
Moral Wisdom and Good Lives.John Kekes - 2018 - Cornell University Press.
Moral Wisdom and Good Lives.Christine Swanton - 1998 - Mind 107 (428):898-900.

View all 11 references / Add more references