Is Technology Good for Us? A Eudaimonic Meta-Model for Evaluating the Contributive Capability of Technologies for a Good Life
NanoEthics 5 (3):335-343 (2011)
AbstractThe title refers to the question addressed in this paper, namely, to what degree if any technology, including nanotechnologies, in the form of products and processes, is capable of contributing to a good life. To answer that question, the paper will develop a meta-normative model whose primary purpose is to determine the essential conditions that any normative theory of the Good Life and Technology (T-GLAT) must adequately address in order to be able to account for, explain and evaluate the Contributive Capability of Technology for a Good Life (CCT-GL). By CCT-GL understand the capability of any technological product or process in its design and/or its use to contribute in some way, if any, to the good life of individuals and society at large. In this paper, the all-embracing term “technology” will be used to refer to both the products and processes of different technologies.
Similar books and articles
Information, Knowledge and Wisdom: Groundwork for the Normative Evaluation of Digital Information and its Relation to the Good Life. [REVIEW]Edward H. Spence - 2011 - Ethics and Information Technology 13 (3):261-275.
Technology and the Good Life?Eric Higgs, Andrew Light & David Strong (eds.) - 2000 - University of Chicago Press.
Technology, Recommendation and Design: On Being a 'Paternalistic' Philosopher.Pak-Hang Wong - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (1):27-42.
The Good Life and the Human Good.Ellen Frankel Paul, Fred Dycus Miller & Jeffrey Paul (eds.) - 1992 - Cambridge University Press.
Understanding What’s Good for Us.Michael J. Zimmerman - 2009 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12 (4):429 - 439.
Human Development or Human Enhancement? A Methodological Reflection on Capabilities and the Evaluation of Information Technologies.Mark Coeckelbergh - 2011 - Ethics and Information Technology 13 (2):81-92.
What is the Rational Care Theory of Welfare? A Comment on Stephen Darwall's Welfare and Rational Care.Fred Feldman - 2006
The Quality of Work Life — the Volvo Experience.Berth Jönsson - 1982 - Journal of Business Ethics 1 (2):119 - 126.
The Time of Our Lives: The Ethics of Common Sense.Mortimer Jerome Adler - 1969 - Fordham University Press.
On the Neutrality of Redistribution in a General Equilibrium Model with Public Goods.Antonio Villanacci & Ünal Zenginobuz - manuscript
Virilio, War and Technology: Some Critical Reflections.Douglas Kellner - 1999 - Theory, Culture and Society 16 (5-6):103-125.
Borgmann, Technology and the Good Life? And the Empirical Turn for Philosophy of Technology.Hans Achterhuis - 2002 - Techne 6 (1):64-75.
The Good Cause Account of the Meaning of Life.Aaron Smuts - 2013 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 51 (4):536-562.
Why We Need Better Ethics for Emerging Technologies.James H. Moor - 2005 - Ethics and Information Technology 7 (3):111-119.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No citations found.
References found in this work
Eudaimonism, Love and Friendship, and Political Community*: DAVID O. BRINK.David O. Brink - 1999 - Social Philosophy and Policy 16 (1):252-289.