It Could be You--But Would it be Fair? Theories of Iustice and the National Lottery, 95 Katherine Hawley Volume 13 Number 1 1999 [Book Review]

Cogito 13 (1):216 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

How things persist.Katherine Hawley - 2001 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Trust: A Very Short Introduction.Katherine Hawley - 2012 - Oxford University Press.
A Review of the Lottery Paradox.Gregory Wheeler - 2007 - In William Harper & Gregory Wheeler (eds.), Probability and Inference: Essays in Honour of Henry E. Kyburg, Jr. College Publications.
Pumped up Physicalism. [REVIEW]Katherine Hawley - 2005 - Metascience 14 (2):277-281.
The enfranchisement lottery.Claudio Lopez-Guerra - 2011 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 10 (2):1470594-10372206.
Ontological Innocence.Katherine Hawley - 2014 - In A. J. Cotnoir & Donald L. M. Baxter (eds.), Composition as Identity. Oxford University Press. pp. 70-89.
Types of Personal Identity.Katherine Hawley - 1997 - Cogito 11 (2):117-122.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-28

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Robin Attfield
Cardiff University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references