Grace, Natura Pura, and the Metaphysics of Status

Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 91:127-143 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Christian Personalists have objected to Thomism’s claim that humans could have existed in a state of pure nature, on the grounds that this claim entails that historical states like grace do not give fundamental meaning to us, that these states are merely accidental, and that it led to modern secularism. I show that Thomism can affirm its traditional claims regarding grace and pure nature, while denying the first two implications, by developing the Thomistic metaphysics of status. In Thomism rightly understood persons develop historically through status in non-accidental ways and grace gives fundamental meaning to our lives. But I also argue that modern secular experiences are natural to the human person, not merely the result of sin, and that this is rightly supported by the theory of pure nature.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,347

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

“Made Worthy of the Holy Spirit”.Brian Dunkle - 2019 - Augustinian Studies 50 (1):1-12.
A footnote in the history of φυσις.John Llewelyn - 2001 - Research in Phenomenology 31 (1):39-61.
Natura Pura: Two Recent Works.Thomas M. Osborne - 2013 - Nova et Vetera 11 (1).
Deus sive natura. Über Spinozas so genannten Pantheismus.Winfried Schröder - 2009 - Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 57 (3):471-480.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-09-06

Downloads
10 (#1,199,765)

6 months
3 (#984,149)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mark K. Spencer
University of St. Thomas, Minnesota

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references