Defining and explaining culture (comments on Richerson and Boyd, not by genes alone)

Biology and Philosophy 23 (2):283-292 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We argue that there is a continuum of cases without any demarcation between more individual and more cultural information, and that therefore “culture” should be viewed as a property that human mental representations and practices exhibit to a varying degree rather than as a type or a subclass of these representations and practices (or of “information”). We discuss the relative role of preservative and constructive processes in transmission. We suggest a revision of Richerson and Boyd’s classification of the forces of cultural evloution.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
152 (#119,815)

6 months
21 (#116,730)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Dan Sperber
Institut Jean Nicod