When do empirical data provide reliable evidence for a hypothesis (theory)? A review of Deborah G. Mayo's Error and the Growth of Experimental Knowledge

Journal of Economic Methodology 8 (3):443-453 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Review. Error and the growth of experimental knowledge. Deborah Mayo.Haṡok Chang - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (3):455-459.
Error and the growth of experimental knowledge.Deborah Mayo - 1996 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 15 (1):455-459.
Error statistics and Duhem's problem.Gregory R. Wheeler - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (3):410-420.
Strategies for securing evidence through model criticism.Kent W. Staley - 2012 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 2 (1):21-43.
Novelty and the 1919 eclipse experiments.G. R. - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 34 (1):107-129.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-26

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Aris Spanos
Virginia Tech

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references