The European Court of Human Rights and the emergence of human germline genome editing-'The right to life' and 'the right to (artificial) procreation'

In Santa Slokenberga, Timo Minssen & Ana Nordberg (eds.), Governing, protecting, and regulating the future of genome editing: the significance of ELSPI perspectives. Boston: Brill/Nijhoff (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

“Involuntary (Moral) Bioenhancement” Can Add Value to the Debate on Human Germline Genome Editing.Vojin Rakić - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (9):54-56.
Does human genome editing reinforce or violate human dignity?Seppe Segers & Heidi Mertes - 2019 - Bioethics 34 (1):33-40.
Why human germline genome editing is incompatible with equality in an inclusive society.Calum MacKellar - 2021 - The New Bioethics 27 (1):19-29.
Human Genome Editing and Ethical Considerations.Kewal Krishan, Tanuj Kanchan & Bahadur Singh - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (2):597-599.
The Duty to Edit the Human Germline.Parker Crutchfield - 2022 - Res Publica 29 (3):347-365.
Prospects of Human Germline Modification by CRISPR-Cas9 – an Ethicist’s View.Dieter Birnbacher - 2018 - In Matthias Braun, Hannah Schickl & Peter Dabrock (eds.), Between Moral Hazard and Legal Uncertainty: Ethical, Legal and Societal Challenges of Human Genome Editing. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. pp. 53-66.
A critical review of the ethical and legal issues in human germline gene editing: Considering human rights and a call for an African perspective.B. Shozi - 2020 - South African Journal of Bioethics and Law 13 (1):62.
Integrating Ethical Standards into the Human Rights Framework.Fruzsina Molnár-Gábor - 2018 - In Matthias Braun, Hannah Schickl & Peter Dabrock (eds.), Between Moral Hazard and Legal Uncertainty: Ethical, Legal and Societal Challenges of Human Genome Editing. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. pp. 31-50.
Untangling the Promises of Human Genome Editing.Katherine Drabiak - 2018 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 46 (4):991-1009.
Global bioethics.Carolyn P. Neuhaus - 2017 - Hastings Center Report 47 (6):inside front cover-inside front.
Between Moral Hazard and Legal Uncertainty: Ethical, Legal and Societal Challenges of Human Genome Editing.Matthias Braun, Hannah Schickl & Peter Dabrock (eds.) - 2018 - Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
Human germline editing: a historical perspective.Michel Morange - 2017 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 39 (4):34.
Human Genome Editing and Identity: The Precariousness of Existence and the Abundance of Argumentative Options.Inmaculada de Melo-Martín - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (9):18-20.
Genome Editing Technologies and Human Germline Genetic Modification: The Hinxton Group Consensus Statement.Sarah Chan, Peter J. Donovan, Thomas Douglas, Christopher Gyngell, John Harris, Robin Lovell-Badge, Debra J. H. Mathews, Alan Regenberg & On Behalf of the Hinxton Group - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (12):42-47.
Human Germline Genome Editing in the Clinical Context.Giovanni Rubeis - 2018 - In Matthias Braun, Hannah Schickl & Peter Dabrock (eds.), Between Moral Hazard and Legal Uncertainty: Ethical, Legal and Societal Challenges of Human Genome Editing. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. pp. 149-160.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-11-19

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references