Lies, language, and logic in the late Middle Ages

London: Variorum Reprints (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

'This sentence is false' - is that true? The 'Liar paradox' embodied in those words exerted a particular fascination on the logicians of the Western later Middle Ages, and, along with similar 'insoluble' problems, forms the subject of the first group of articles in this volume. In the following parts Professor Spade turns to medieval semantic theory, views on the relationship between language and thought, and to a study of one particular genre of disputation, that known as 'obligationes'. The focus is on the Oxford scholastics of the first half of the 14th century, and it is the name of William of Ockham which dominates these pages - a thinker with whom Professor Spade finds himself in considerable philosophical sympathy, and whose work on logic and semantic theory has a depth and richness that have not always been sufficiently appreciated.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
13 (#973,701)

6 months
6 (#417,196)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul Vincent Spade
Indiana University, Bloomington

Citations of this work

Plural signification and the Liar paradox.Stephen Read - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 145 (3):363-375.
Insolubles.Paul Vincent Spade - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The Byzantine Liar.Stamatios Gerogiorgakis - 2009 - History and Philosophy of Logic 30 (4):313-330.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references