Editorial. Censoring Science in Research Officially

Environmental Values 19 (2):141-146 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.3197/096327110x12699420220473

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Censoring Science in Research Officially.Clive L. Spash - 2010 - Environmental Values 19 (2):141 - 146.
Cutting edges cut both ways.Jane Maienschein - 1994 - Biology and Philosophy 9 (1):1-24.
Educational Research: A Reply to Professor Pring.Patrick Ainley - 2000 - British Journal of Educational Studies 48 (3):309 - 314.
Editorial: Changes Needed.Clive L. Spash - 2013 - Environmental Values 22 (1):1-5.
Editorial: Seeking Sustainability.Clive L. Spash - 2014 - Environmental Values 23 (1):1-6.
Editorial: Green Economy, Red Herring.Clive L. Spash - 2012 - Environmental Values 21 (2):95-99.
Current Editorial Initiatives: A Progress Report.Werner Ulrich & D. P. Dash - 2013 - Journal of Research Practice 9 (1):Article E1.
Editorial: Terrible Economics, Ecosystems and Banking.Clive L. Spash - 2011 - Environmental Values 20 (2):141-145.
Returning to a New Home.Robert L. Goldstone - 2005 - Cognitive Science 29 (1):1-4.
Editorial: Celebrating 90 years of science education: Reflections on the gold standard and ways of promoting good research.Nancy W. Brickhouse - 2006 - Science Education 90 (1):1-7.
Introducing new editorial roles and measures: Making the Journal of Research Practice relevant to researchers.D. P. Dash & Werner Ulrich - 2012 - Journal of Research Practice 8 (1):Article - E1.
What counts as quality in qualitative research?(guest editorial).Douglas A. Roberts - 1996 - Science Education 80 (3):243-248.
Editorial. The New Environmental Pragmatists, Pluralism and Sustainability.Clive L. Spash - 2009 - Environmental Values 18 (3):253-256.
B Is For Burqa, C Is For Censorship: The Miseducative Effects of Censoring Muslim Girls and Women's Sartorial Discourse.Claudia W. Ruitenberg - 2008 - Educational Studies: A Jrnl of the American Educ. Studies Assoc 43 (1):17-28.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-17

Downloads
18 (#811,325)

6 months
3 (#992,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references