And Lead Us (Not) into Persuasion…? Persuasive Technology and the Ethics of Communication

Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (4):633-650 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper develops ethical guidelines for the development and usage of persuasive technologies (PT) that can be derived from applying discourse ethics to this type of technologies. The application of discourse ethics is of particular interest for PT, since ‘persuasion’ refers to an act of communication that might be interpreted as holding the middle between ‘manipulation’ and ‘convincing’. One can distinguish two elements of discourse ethics that prove fruitful when applied to PT: the analysis of the inherent normativity of acts of communication (‘speech acts’) and the Habermasian distinction between ‘communicative’ and ‘strategic rationality’ and their broader societal interpretation. This essay investigates what consequences can be drawn if one applies these two elements of discourse ethics to PT.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Rhetoric, technical writing, and ethics.Michael Davis - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (4):463-478.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-11

Downloads
100 (#167,981)

6 months
4 (#698,851)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

How to do things with words.John Langshaw Austin - 1962 - Oxford [Eng.]: Clarendon Press. Edited by Marina Sbisá & J. O. Urmson.
Knowledge and human interests.Jürgen Habermas - 1971 - London [etc.]: Heinemann Educational.
Speech Acts.J. Searle - 1969 - Foundations of Language 11 (3):433-446.

View all 27 references / Add more references