The tissue organization field theory of cancer: A testable replacement for the somatic mutation theory

&
Bioessays 33 (5):332-340 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

DOI

10.1002/bies.201100025

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 84,292

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Response to “The tissue organization field theory of cancer: A testable replacement for the somatic mutation theory”. [REVIEW]David L. Vaux - 2011 - Bioessays 33 (9):660-661.
Response to “In defense of the somatic mutation theory of cancer”.Carlos Sonnenschein & Ana M. Soto - 2011 - Bioessays 33 (9):657-659.
In defense of the somatic mutation theory of cancer.David L. Vaux - 2011 - Bioessays 33 (5):341-343.
Counterpoints in cancer: The somatic mutation theory under attack.David Thomas & Andrew Moore - 2011 - Bioessays 33 (5):313-314.
On somatic mutations and tissue fields in cancer.Satgé Daniel - 2011 - Bioessays 33 (12):922-923.
On somatic mutations and tissue fields in cancer: additional observations challenge the SMT.Daniel Satgé - 2011 - Bioessays: News and Reviews in Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology 33 (12):922.
Metaphysical presuppositions and scientific practices: Reductionism and organicism in cancer research.James A. Marcum - 2005 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 19 (1):31 – 45.
Somatic Evolution of Cells and the Development of Cancer.Dominik Wodarz - 2006 - Biological Theory 1 (2):119-122.
The Role of Bodily Perception in Emotion: In Defense of an Impure Somatic Theory.Luca Barlassina & Albert Newen - 2014 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 89 (3):637-678.
Bioethics and Cancer: When the Professional Becomes Personal.Rebecca Dresser - 2011 - Hastings Center Report 41 (6):14-18.
A passion of the soul: An introduction to pain for consciousness researchers.C. R. Chapman & Yutaka Nakamura - 1999 - Consciousness and Cognition 8 (4):391-422.
Cancer causes and cancer research on many levels of complexity.Sunny Y. Auyang - unknown
Next step, synergetics?Wolfgang Tschacher & Ulrich M. Junghan - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (1):66-67.
Cancer and the Goals of Integration.Anya Plutynski - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences (4):466-476.
Definition and classification of cancer: Monothetic or polythetic?Paolo Vineis - 1993 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 14 (3).

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-28

Downloads
112 (#128,627)

6 months
4 (#200,270)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ana M. Soto
Tufts University

Citations of this work

The division of cognitive labor: two missing dimensions of the debate.Baptiste Bedessem - 2018 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 9 (1):3.

View all 33 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas Samuel Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Otto Neurath.
Criticism and the growth of knowledge.Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.) - 1970 - Cambridge [Eng.]: Cambridge University Press.
Darwin's Dangerous Idea.Daniel Dennett - 1994 - Behavior and Philosophy 24 (2):169-174.

View all 14 references / Add more references