The tissue organization field theory of cancer: A testable replacement for the somatic mutation theory

Bioessays 33 (5):332-340 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The somatic mutation theory (SMT) of cancer has been and remains the prevalent theory attempting to explain how neoplasms arise and progress. This theory proposes that cancer is a clonal, cell‐based disease, and implicitly assumes that quiescence is the default state of cells in multicellular organisms. The SMT has not been rigorously tested, and several lines of evidence raise questions that are not addressed by this theory. Herein, we propose experimental strategies that may validate the SMT. We also call attention to an alternative theory of carcinogenesis, the tissue organization field theory (TOFT), which posits that cancer is a tissue‐based disease and that proliferation is the default state of all cells. Based on epistemological and experimental evidence, we argue that the TOFT compellingly explains carcinogenesis, while placing it within an evolutionarily relevant context.magnified imagemagnified imageAna Soto and Carlos Sonnenschein are at Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On somatic mutations and tissue fields in cancer: additional observations challenge the SMT.Daniel Satgé - 2011 - Bioessays: News and Reviews in Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology 33 (12):922.
Metaphysical presuppositions and scientific practices: Reductionism and organicism in cancer research.James A. Marcum - 2005 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 19 (1):31 – 45.
Next step, synergetics?Wolfgang Tschacher & Ulrich M. Junghan - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (1):66-67.
Cancer and the Goals of Integration.Anya Plutynski - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences (4):466-476.
Definition and classification of cancer: Monothetic or polythetic?Paolo Vineis - 1993 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 14 (3).

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-28

Downloads
116 (#142,527)

6 months
5 (#247,092)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ana M. Soto
Tufts University