The Factors of Moral Worth
Dissertation, Yale University (2003)
Abstract
Actions are right or wrong; agents are good or bad. Most ethicists are interested in the first dimension. My work is about the second. Factors relevant to the first dimension include, for example, the action's consequences and whether the action is a harm. But many other morally compelling factors are neglected if we focus exclusively on right and wrong---factors such as motives, intentions, effort, and character. These are among the factors of a second dimension, moral worth: the goodness or badness of agents. We can perform right actions without being good agents. Knowing which actions are right only partially helps us answer the question of what it is to be good. ;I take it that what I have just said reflects ordinary moral intuitions. Nevertheless moral worth is a neglected topic in contemporary philosophical ethics. Others have written about specific virtues, or about "virtue ethics" as an alternative moral theory to consequentialism and deontology. But I know of no one else who has attempted a close analysis of the general factors that constitute praiseworthiness and blameworthiness. An account of these factors is relevant to any of the three leading contemporary ethical theories. ;My examination of these factors yields a surprising wealth of possible positions. I map out these positions and argue for the best of them. My specific topics include the nature of motives, Kantian views about the motive of duty, the relative weight of first-order and second-order motives, patterns of motives, effort as a complex of apparently conflicting subfactors, and the relevance of counterfactual circumstances to character. I appeal to the cases of Oskar Schindler and Huck Finn, among others, to illustrate the complexities of these issues. ;My dissertation is the first systematic analysis of the factors of moral worth. Internal states of persons---motives, intentions, effort, character---matter to us, and an ethical theory is richer with an adequate account of themAuthor's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
The Relationship Between Effort and Moral Worth: Three Amendments to Sorensen’s Model.Thomas Douglas - 2014 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (2):325-334.
Effort Expended, Effort Required, and the Theory of the Good.Kelly Sorensen - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 49:83-110.
The Relation of Moral Worth to the Good Will in Kant’s Ethics.Walter E. Schaller - 1992 - Journal of Philosophical Research 17:351-382.
The Kantian Moral Worth of Actions Contrary to Duty.Samuel J. Kerstein - 1999 - Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 53 (4):530 - 552.
Kant's Theory of Moral Worth.Robert N. Johnson - 1993 - Dissertation, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
On the value of acting from the motive of duty.Barbara Herman - 1981 - Philosophical Review 90 (3):359-382.
Consequentialism, Moral Motivation and the Deontic Relevance of Motives.Seven Sverdlik - forthcoming - In Iakovos Vasiliou (ed.), Moral Motivation: A History. Oxford University press.
Moral Motivation and Moral Action.Julie Ane Tannenbaum - 2002 - Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles
Character, Freedom and Practical Reason.Stephanie Sophia Reibetanz - 2000 - Dissertation, Harvard University
Virtue and the Moral Law: An Analysis of Virtue and Moral Worth in Kant's Moral Philosophy.Walter Edwin Schaller - 1984 - Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin - Madison
Virtue Ethics and Right Action.Diana Courtney Fleming - 2003 - Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley
Analytics
Added to PP
2015-02-05
Downloads
1 (#1,501,023)
6 months
1 (#452,962)
2015-02-05
Downloads
1 (#1,501,023)
6 months
1 (#452,962)
Historical graph of downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.