Lying with Conditionals

Philosophical Quarterly 62 (249):820-832 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

If you read this abstract, then you will understand what my essay is about. Under what conditions would the preceding assertion be a lie? Traditional definitions of lying are always applied to straight declaratives such as ‘The dog ate my homework’. This one sided diet of examples leaves us unprepared for sentences in which conditional probability governs assertibility. The truth-value of conditionals does not play a significant role in the sincere assertion of conditionals. Lying is insincere assertion. So the connection between lying and falsehood is broken when lying with conditionals. Drawing on Frank Jackson's account of indicative conditionals. I argue that it is possible to lie with true conditionals by virtue of their false conventional implicatures. False conversational implicatures only guarantee misleading assertions, not lies. Lying remains a semantic rather than a pragmatic affair.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,466

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What Is Lying.Don Fallis - 2009 - Journal of Philosophy 106 (1):29-56.
Conditionals.Frank Jackson (ed.) - 1991 - Oxford University Press.
Lying and Asserting.Andreas Stokke - 2013 - Journal of Philosophy 110 (1):33-60.
Lying and Deception.Don Fallis - 2010 - Philosophers' Imprint 10.
Lies and Dishonest Endorsements.Alexander R. Pruss - 2010 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 84:213-222.
Bald-Faced Lies! Lying Without the Intent to Deceive.Roy Sorensen - 2007 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 88 (2):251-264.
Subjunctive Biscuit and Stand-Off Conditionals.Eric Swanson - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 163 (3):637-648.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-08-01

Downloads
87 (#139,089)

6 months
2 (#277,237)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Roy Sorensen
University of Texas at Austin

Citations of this work

I—Lucifer’s Logic Lesson: How to Lie with Arguments.Roy Sorensen - 2017 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 91 (1):105-126.
Scientific Deceit.Stephen John - 2018 - Synthese 198 (1):373-394.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references