Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (12):831-832 (2008)
AbstractIt is now 10 years ago that human embryonic stem cell research appeared as a major topic of societal concern following significant scientific breakthroughs.1 2 During these 10 years it has become obvious that stem cell research is embedded in a narrative characterised by hope and hype and that it has created heated moral and political debate. Although it would be tempting to try to deconstruct the importance attributed to hope in this story or to unmask the different instigators active in promoting hype,3–5 the main aim of this editorial is to briefly review the controversies underlying the debate and propose some possible answers to a set of inter-related questions: What are the main disagreements in the stem cell debate? Is there any hope that we can resolve these main disagreements? Has the debate been a fruitful model for future debates about ethically contentious issues in biomedicine, or has it been characterised more by rhetoric than by argument? What kind of ethical debates are most efficient as models for future debates?The two authors agree with regard to the importance of asking these questions, but they disagree about at least some of the answers. Let us start with the questions about the debate and its use as a model for future debates.WHAT KIND OF ETHICAL DEBATE IS MOST EFFICIENT AS A MODEL FOR FUTURE DEBATES?Could it be the case that ethical debates that are characterised by overselling of the potential of the technology are more efficient as models for future debates about ethically contentious issues in biomedicine than more sober and “neutral” debates? The narratives of stem cell research are full of examples of overselling and underselling, and we will suggest that it is precisely for this reason that there is a lot to learn morally from reviewing the narratives. The two main forms of overselling are therapeutic …
Similar books and articles
Stem Cell Research: An Ethical Evaluation of Policy Options.Nikolaus Knoepffler - 2004 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 14 (1):55-74.
Moral Complicity in Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Research.Mark T. Brown - 2009 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 19 (1):pp. 1-22.
International Society for Stem Cell Research (ISSCR) Guidelines for the Conduct of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research (December 2006).Bernard Dickens - unknown
How is the Ethics of Stem Cell Research Different From the Ethics of Abortion?Elizabeth Harman - 2007 - Metaphilosophy 38 (2-3):207–225.
The Ethics and Politics of Small Sacrifices in Stem Cell Research.Glenn McGee & Arthur L. Caplan - 1999 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 9 (2):151-158.
Stemming the Tide of Normalisation: An Expanded Feminist Analysis of the Ethics and Social Impact of Embryonic Stem Cell Research.Shelley Tremain - 2006 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 3 (1-2):33-42.
A Natural Stem Cell Therapy? How Novel Findings and Biotechnology Clarify the Ethics of Stem Cell Research.P. Patel - 2006 - Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (4):235-239.
Broadening the Scope of Debates Around Stem Cell Research.Tamra Lysaght & Alastair V. Campbell - 2013 - Bioethics 27 (5):251-256.
The Stem Cell Debate Continues: The Buying and Selling of Eggs for Research.Françoise Baylis & Carolyn McLeod - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (12):726-731.
The Ethics of Moral Compromise for Stem Cell Research Policy.Zubin Master & G. K. D. Crozier - 2012 - Health Care Analysis 20 (1):50-65.
Informed Consent and Federal Funding for Stem Cell Research.Robert Streiffer - 2008 - Hastings Center Report 38 (3):pp. 40-47.
The Ethics of Funding Embryonic Stem Cell Research: A Catholic Viewpoint.Richard M. Doerflinger - 1999 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 9 (2):137-150.
Abortion, Embryonic Stem Cell Research, and Waste.David A. Jensen - 2008 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (1):27-41.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No citations found.
References found in this work
The Ethical Case Against Stem Cell Research.Søren Holm - 2003 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 12 (4):372-383.
Therapeutic Doubt and Moral Dialogue.Jan Helge Solbakk - 2004 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (1):93 – 118.
Adam's Fibroblast? The (Pluri)Potential of iPCs.S. Chan & J. Harris - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (2):64-66.
Time to Reconsider Stem Cell Ethics--The Importance of Induced Pluripotent Cells.S. Holm - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (2):63-64.