By Steve Fuller

Abstract

Social Text , along with an explication of all the relatively minor errors and jokes planted in the article that would have been caught by the cognoscenti in physics. That alone has been sufficient to attract global media attention about the alleged lack of quality control in cultural studies scholarship. However, Sokal and Bricmont are out for bigger game. They want to trace these lapses from professionalism to a relativist philosophical sensibility, which in turn is held responsible for the dissipation of the US academic left. Since I have dealt with the larger aspects of this thesis elsewhere (Fuller, 1999), I shall largely confine myself to the 'intermezzo' chapter four, where relativism is attacked directly on what are alleged to be philosophical grounds.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Social epistemology: What’s in it for psychologists?Steve Fuller - 1989 - Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 9 (2):2-10.
Steve Fuller and Intelligent Design.Jeremy Shearmur - 2010 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 40 (3):433-445.
Towards objectivism and relativism.Steve Fuller - 1987 - Social Epistemology 1 (4):351 – 361.
The normative failure of Fuller's social epistemology.Heidi E. Grasswick - 2001 - Social Epistemology 16 (2):133 – 148.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
9 (#1,176,028)

6 months
1 (#1,428,112)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alan Sokal
American University in Cairo

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references