Forty-Eight Classical Moral Dilemmas in Persian Language: A Validation and Cultural Adaptation Study

Journal of Cognition and Culture 22 (3-4):352-382 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Moral dilemmas are a useful tool to investigate empirically, which parameters of a given situation modulate participants’ moral judgment, and in what way. In an effort to provide moral judgment data from a non-WEIRD culture, we provide the translation and validation of 48 classical moral dilemmas in Persian language. The translated dilemma set was submitted to a validation experiment with N = 82 Iranian participants. The four-factor structure of this dilemma set was confirmed; including Personal Force, Benefit Recipient, Evitability, and Intentionality. When comparing moral judgments of Iranian participants to those of Spanish and Italian participants’ from previous research with the same dilemma set, differences emerged. Iranian participants’ moral judgments were more deontological, than Spanish and Italian participants. Religiosity made participants’ moral judgments more deontological, and also dysphoric mood resulted in a more deontological response style.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 89,330

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Third Culture: Movement Toward Moral Inquiry and Orientation.Carmen T. Mendoza - 2002 - Dissertation, Loyola University of Chicago
Excuse Validation: A Cross‐cultural Study.John Turri - 2019 - Cognitive Science 43 (8):e12748.
Real-Life Moral Judgment.Gillian R. Wark - 1996 - Dissertation, Simon Fraser University (Canada)
Nourooz celebration in India.Ali Akbar Shah - 2013 - SOCRATES 1 (1):80-92.
The Moral Theory Behind Moral Dilemmas.Alex Rajczi - 2002 - American Philosophical Quarterly 39 (4):373-383.


Added to PP

10 (#1,012,446)

6 months
3 (#424,136)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?