Translational Research Beyond Approval: A Two-Stage Ethics Review

American Journal of Bioethics 10 (8):W1-W3 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Commentators on the ethics of translational research find it morally problematic. Types of translational research are said to involve questionable benefits, special risks, additional barriers to informed consent, and severe conflicts of interest. Translational research conducted on the global poor is thought to exploit them and increase international disparities. Some commentators support especially stringent ethical review. However, such concerns are grounded only in pre-approval translational research. Whether or not T1 has these features, translational research beyond approval is unlikely to and, when conducted on the global poor, may support development. Therefore, insofar as T1 is morally problematic, and no independent objections to T2 exist, the ethics of translational research is diverse: while some translational research is problematic, some is not. Funding and oversight should reflect this diversity, and T2 should be encouraged, particularly when conducted among the global poor.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 80,057

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Diverse Ethics of Translational Research.Neema Sofaer & Nir Eyal - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (8):19-30.
Post-approval Translational Research Itself Has Diverse Ethics.Joia Mukherjee - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (8):43-44.
Ethics in construction project briefing.Richard Fellows, Anita Liu & Colin Storey - 2004 - Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (2):289-301.


Added to PP

34 (#358,301)

6 months
1 (#477,912)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nir Eyal
Harvard University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations